Legal Opinion

E. P. Reed & Co. v. F. C. Pinney & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 21, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. George Driggs, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMoran, J.

Appellants brought replevin against appellees to recover certain goods they claimed, on the ground that the sale and delivery thereof on credit had been induced by false representations made by appellees as to their financial condition. On the trial the court refused plaintiffs’ instructions asked, and gave, of his own motion, the following: “ The jury are instructed that if they believe from the evidence that the plaintiffs relied upon the statements of the defendant as to his financial condition at the time of the sale and delivery of the goods in controversy in this cause, and if the jury…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mead v. DegolyerNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Farwell v. HanchettIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Case v. AyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Catlin v. WarrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
  5. Drabek v. Grand Lodge of Bohemian Slavonian Benevolent SocietyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John V. Farwell Co. v. NathansonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  2. Wilson Bros. v. HaegeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API