Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Southrail Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 31, 1992No. 1901101Published

1Opinion of the Court

ALMON, Justice.

This appeal is from a summary judgment for the defendants in an action filed under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“the FELA”). The summary judgment was entered on the basis of res judicata, but the plaintiff argues that the defendants had not filed an answer and so had not raised the affirmative defense of res judicata.

Sylvester Bishop filed this action against SouthRail Corporation, MidSouth Corporation, and Erwin Townsend, alleging that, while Bishop and Townsend were employees of SouthRail, Townsend had hit Bishop in the eye with a metal rod and injured his eye.1 The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Selby v. MoneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Marlow v. Mid South Tool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. State v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Higgins v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Teamsters Local 515 v. Roadbuilders, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API