Maynard v. Heeren
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKonenkamp, Justice
[¶22.] How much of one’s innermost secrets must be exposed when mental and emotional state become an issue in a lawsuit? In ordering virtually unlimited access to all records, I believe the circuit court abused its discretion by failing to oversee a process of allowing pertinent disclosure. Now the majority endorses the error by announcing a rule of “absolute” access to a patient’s psychotherapy records. While I generally concur with the Court’s analysis of privilege waiver under SDCL 19-2-3 and 19-13-11, I wholly disagree with its inadequate treatment of what becomes discoverable following…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.