Legal Opinion

Hodgins v. Zabel

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSolomon Boneparth, J.

Trial before the court without a jury. Findings and conclusions were waived. Neither of the defendant banks appeared at the trial. The plaintiff’s ease was contested upon the trial, only by defendant, Zabel.

Plaintiff is the father of the defendant Zabel and two sons. Plaintiff’s wife, the mother of these three children, died in October, 1955. Some time after the death of his wife, plaintiff remarried. His children did not approve of his remarriage. Shortly after his remarriage, plaintiff indicated that he was not getting along with his second wife.

In December, 1956 plaintiff had a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moskowitz v. MarrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of BolinNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. In Re the Estate of PoriandaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Leonard v. . PierceNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. In re the Estate of McCarthyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bloom v. Bank for SavingsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958
  3. O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Rugby Funding Ltd. v. SchreckNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  5. University of Montana v. CoeMontana Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API