Legal Opinion

Andersen v. Sportmart, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided July 14, 1999No. 2:94 CV 0136ASPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. LEE, Chief Judge.

In July, 1992, plaintiff, Amanda Andersen, suffered a severe eye injury while playing in her backyard with an allegedly defective batting tee. The injury spawned the present lawsuit wherein Andersen and her parents sued the distributors, sellers 1 , and manufacturer 2 of the batting tee under negligence, products liability, and breach of warranty theories. Seeking contribution and indemnification, Defendants General Sportcraft, Sportmart, Wilson, and Foremost (collectively referenced herein as “Sportcraft”) filed their…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LagroneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Docrx, Inc. v. Dox Consulting, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2010
  3. KnowledgeAZ, Inc. v. Jim Walter Resources, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2006
  4. Johnson Litho Graphics of Eau Claire, Ltd. v. SarverCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  5. Auffenberg v. AddMi, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API