Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided May 9, 1997No. Nos. A 6016, A-6025 and A-6036PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Each of the appellants in this case visited a Fairbanks residence while the police were executing a search warrant for the premises. The officers searched each of the appellants as they arrived, and the officers found cocaine on each appellant.

Each of the appellants was indicted for possession of cocaine (fourth-degree misconduct involving a controlled substance), AS 11.71.040(a). Following their indictment, Davis, Fox, and Thronsen sought suppression of the cocaine; they argued that the police had lacked authority to search them, either because the warrant was invalid or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moreau v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. WiseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. People v. LewocAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. People v. WileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. State v. StoneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Osborne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018
  4. Osborne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018
  5. Osborne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API