Legal Opinion
De Baun v. Pardee
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.
[1] Although some of the defendants are not tenants in common, with plaintiff, but claim adversely, still, with the broadened scope of the present jurisdiction in partition, the rights of such adverse parties may be here tried and determined. Satterlee v. Kobbe, 173 N. Y. 91, 65 N. E. 952; Brown v. Feek, 204 N. Y. 238, 97 N. E. 526.
[2] The defendants Stoddard et al. claim title to lands formerly parts of the beds of streets, as laid out upon the Ewer map of March 4, 1836.' This issue depends upon the proper construction of the boundaries as stated in the 1843 mortgage from Ewer to Maxey,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holloway v. . SouthmaydNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Van Winkle v. . Van WinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Satterlee v. . KobbeNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Croner v. . CowdreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Brown v. . FeekNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- De Baun v. PardeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915