Hessling v. Peerless Oil Co.

Swoyer, P. J.,

Plaintiff having filed his statement of claim in the above-stated case, counsel for defendant corporation entered his appearance de bene esse and subsequently filed his motion to quash the summons and set aside service thereof. It is upon this motion and the rule granted thereon that the matter is before the court.

Defendant’s motion recites five reasons wherefor service of the summons should be set aside, four of which set forth that the said summons was not served in accordance with the provisions of the Act of April 3, 1903, P. L. 139, nor with those of the Act of July 9,…