Legal Opinion
Rose v. Dredge Enterprise
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided April 28, 1988No. 87-27-CIV-4APublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLES K. McCOTTER, Jr., United States Magistrate.
This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend complaint. The plaintiff, injured while employed as a crew member of the dredge ENTERPRISE, brought this action pursuant to the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, and general maritime law of unseaworthiness. In his complaint, the plaintiff requested a jury trial under the Jones Act and also stated that the action was within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the court within the meaning of Rule 9(h), Fed.R.Civ. P. The defendants contend that the plaintiff is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jimmy P. Davis, as of the Estate of Dallas D. Hardy, Jr., Deceased v. Piper Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Durden v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Hassinger v. Tideland Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Delta Marine, Inc. v. WhaleyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Subaru Distributors Corp. v. General Ship Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996