Wood v. Elliott

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 9 contained in the enumerations of error, which raise the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to1 support the verdict (the equivalent of the general grounds of a motion for new trial), are without merit. The defendants introduced evidence which showed the line was as contended for by them. There being some evidence to support the verdict it will not be distrubed by this court. Schuster v. Schuster, 221 Ga. 614 (1) (146 SE2d 636).

While on cross examination a witness for the defendants volunteered the following statement which was in nowise…