Legal Opinion

Powell v. American Sumatra Tobacco Company

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 3, 1944PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, J.:

A judgment was recovered against appellants for the negligent operation of a train which resulted in the killing of appellees’ cows.

We are asked to reverse the judgment because the trial judge charged the jury that there was a statutory (Sec. 768.05, F.S.A. ’41) presumption of fact against the railroad where the damage was shown to have been inflicted by the operation of the train. Appellants rely on our opinion in A.C.L. R.R. Co. v. Voss; A.C.L. R.R. Co. v. Redemptorists, 136 Fla. 32, 186 So. 199, and Loftin, et al., v. Skelton, 152 Fla. 437, 12 So. (2nd) 175.

Appellees recognize…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loftin v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. A.C.L.R.R. Co. v. Voss A.C.L.R.R. Co. v. RedemptoristsSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leonetti v. BooneSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. PondsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. Hudson v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API