Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bethesda Memorial Hospital, In Re:

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 26, 1997No. 96-5034Published

1DissentHatchett, Chief Judge

Without the benefit of briefing or clear guidance from the Supreme Court, a majority of this panel sua sponte abandons a firmly rooted line of circuit authority holding that a district court’s statutory-based remand order must be challenged by Petition for Writ of Mandamus. In so doing, the majority (1) contravenes the well-established rule that only the en banc court or the Supreme Court may reverse prior panel decisions; (2) alters the standard of review applicable in this case; and (3) compounds the error of a decision that is otherwise wrong on the merits. For these reasons, I…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Gaming Corporation of America Golden Nickel Casinos, Inc. v. Dorsey & Whitney, a Partnership, in Re Dorsey & Whitney, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. In the Matter of Amoco Petroleum Additives Company and Buck Isbell, in the Matter of Robin A.G. Jackson, an Underwriter at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Richard Roe v. John O'DOnOhueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API