Legal Opinion

Klotz v. James

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Buena Vista District Court. — Hon. Lot Thomas, Judge. Action for the recovery of specific personal prop«erty. Judgment for defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Granger; J.

*31 *2I. The defendant is ¡sheriff of Buena Vista county, and as such «seized, by virtue of-certain writs- of attachment, a store building, stock of goods, and other personal property, as belonging to one Henry Boe'se. The plaintiff brings, this, action to recover the property, claiming to be the owner by virtue of a purchase thereof, from Boese before the levy of the attachments. The- answer puts in issue the validity of the sale, and avers it to be fraudulent, as to creditors. The plaintiff used Henry Boese as a witness to- identify the bill of sale as signed by him, which is-dated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. NewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  2. Sioux Valley State Bank v. KellogSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. First Nat. Bank v. Jasper County BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Phillips v. GermonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  5. Commercial National Bank v. Farmers & Traders' National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JaponeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Eno v. Adair County Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Marlatte v. WeickgenantMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Brewster v. ChiCago & Northwestern Railway Company.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Creager v. Johnson Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API