Thompson v. Federal Express Ground
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Plaintiff, Anita Thompson, appeals an opinion and award concluding that defendant-carrier, Crawford and Company, was not required to pay for certain medical treatments plaintiff obtained from an unauthorized physician. For the reasons discussed herein, we affirm the determination of the Industrial Commission.
At the time of plaintiff's hearing before the Industrial Commission, she was fifty-eight years old. She had a BA in business administration and an MA in education. Plaintiff was hired by defendant-employer, Federal Express Ground, as a manager in training. Upon successful…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Kanipe v. Lane UpholsteryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Forrest v. Pitt County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Scurlock v. Durham County General HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- KONRADY, EMPLOYEE v. US Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raper v. Mansfield Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Bell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Bass v. Raleigh-Durham Airport Auth.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007
- Ceballos v. INTREPID USACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Crawford v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.