Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Garlick

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 25, 2005No. 04-0669/AFPublished

1ConcurrenceBaker, Judge

I concur in the Court’s decision affirming Appellant’s conviction. I write separately, however, because I believe that the Court’s analysis should focus on the effect of the violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), in the warrant affidavit, rather than on the Appellant’s imputed pretrial knowledge of that error.

Waiver

The majority disposes of Appellant’s claim principally based upon his failure to act on imputed knowledge of the misrepresentation in the warrant affidavit prior to entry of his guilty plea. Although the lead opinion never uses the term…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API