Legal Opinion

Aeroplate Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 1, 2013No. 12-374CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Subeontractors’ Motion to Intervene; RCFC 24(a)(2)

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

Plaintiff Aeroplate Corp. alleges that the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) breached a contract related to the renovation of the VA medical center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. U.S. Glass, Inc. and XLE Materials, Inc., two of plaintiffs subcontractors on the project, move to intervene in this suit to obtain and enforce an equitable lien on the funds held by the VA that are set aside for the project or owed to plaintiff. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies the subcontractors’…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Erickson Air Crane Company of Washington, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Coltec Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Kennedy Electric Company, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Air Borealis Limited Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API