Legal Opinion

Bell v. New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 28, 1981No. 80 Civ. 2219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MARY JOHNSON LOWE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, pro se, brings this action for violation of his constitutional rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. He requests a judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 declaring his due process rights in the context of a 1975-76 state criminal prosecution that led to his two-count misdemeanor conviction. The Court rules that plaintiff’s claims present no substantial constitutional question and therefore dismisses the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1

INTRODUCTION

For the purpose of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Castro v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. Gilmore v. CurryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  3. Bell v. State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API