Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Daniel's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 3, 1838PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit, and Arbitration From the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. Statement of the controversy.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This was an action of assumpsit brought by Jesse Daniel, as administrator.of Beverly Daniel, against Henry Daniel; and, by consent, the same defence was relied on, “by plea or otherwise,” as in the action of covenant then pending between the same plaintiff in his own right and Henry Daniel, and which has just been decided.

At the September tei’m, 1835, of the Montgomery Circuit Court, the cause, by consent, was referred (as the order then entered in the order book states,) to Richard Apperson and Levi Y. Millspaugh, to be heard and decided at…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allen-Bradley Co. v. Anderson & Nelson Distilleries Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API