Legal Opinion

Deep Vein Coal Co. v. Chicago & E. I. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 27, 1934No. 5138PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant’s mines were served by a switch track which appellee railway had constructed pursuant to a written contract between them. The contract specified, inter alia: •

“8. The Coal Company will also indemnify and save harmless the Eastern Illinois Company for loss, damage or injury from any act or omission of the Coal Company, its employes or agents, to the person or property of the parties hereto and their employes, and to the person or property of any person or corporation while on or about said tracks, and if any claim or liability, other than from fire, shall…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Dery v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. Southern Pacific Co. v. Booth-Kelly Lumber CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Dobry Flour Mills, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Nina N. Anthony and Graydon Anthony, Partners, D/B/A Graydon Anthony Lumber Company v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  5. New York Central Railroad Co. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API