Legal Opinion

American Express Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 12, 1912No. 736PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal horn Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 26052 (T. D. 31757).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The importation here is a species of paper used in the printing of decalcomanias. It is invoiced as “single transfer paper” or as *460“duplex lithotransfer paper.” The paper termed “single” is a one-thickness' paper, the surface of which is coated with a preparation of gum, and the “duplex” is made of two layers united, the lower being plain and the upper coated with a gummy substance. This paper when lithographically printed is used to transfer lithographic impressions to pottery ware, etc. It was assessed for duty under the provision in paragraph 411 of the act of 1909 for “paper with coated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kupfer Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. Borgfeldt & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. H. L. Gwalter & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  2. Erskine v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  3. Martin & Bechtold v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. United States v. Duratex Stencil Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API