Legal Opinion

Klotz Tailoring Co. v. Eastern Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 11, 1907PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. ' .

1Opinion of the Court

Hooker, J.:

This controversy is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts which, so far as material, are as follows : Prior to March 24, 1905, plaintiff’s merchandise and other supplies at certain premises in Columbus, Ohio, were insured against loss by the defendant to the amount of $932.05. On that day they were wholly destroyed by . fire, and were at that time worth the sum of $12,833.79, in which *724sum plaintiff suffered loss by reas on'of the fire. The policy issued by the defendant was in the New York standard form provided for by section 121 of the Insurance Law (Laws of 1892, chap.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. Liverpool & London Fire & Life InsuranceCommission of Appeals · 1872
  2. Farmers' Feed Co. of New Jersey v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Monumental Paving & Excavating, Incorporated v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Wilson Company v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  4. Davis Yarn Co. v. Brooklyn Yarn Dye Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Gillies v. Michigan Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API