LaRault v. Palmer
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Adams county, Zent, J., entered May 18, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for services.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
— Plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $211 alleged to be due for services rendered as a veterinary surgeon. He alleges in his complaint that a customary and reasonable charge for the services is the said sum of $211. Defendant answered, admitting that between the 14th day of September, 1906, and the 27th day of October, 1906, plaintiff had treated several of his horses, but denied that his services were of any value except that plaintiff had done dental work upon two of his horses and that such dental work was of the reasonable value of $5, which sum, with all accrued costs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spalding v. VandercookNew York Supreme Court · 1829
- Eaton v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Young v. BorzoneWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Bouvé v. CottleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Norman v. HopperWashington Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spokane Valley Land & Water Co. v. Arthur D. Jones & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Republic Ins. Co. v. Highland Park Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Dixon v. CoffeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Killingsworth v. KillingsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Hadden v. FuquaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.