Legal Opinion

Milam Bldg. Co. v. Dannelley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1933No. 1335PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff in error, Milam Building Company, a corporation, instituted this suit against defendant in error, John L. Dannelley, to recover the sum of $332.50 alleged to be unpaid rent on a cer.tain room in the Milam building in the city of San Antonio. The parties will be designated as in the trial court. Plaintiff alleged that defendant, by written contract with it, leased room No. 524 in said building for the period of one year, beginning February 1,1929, and ending January 31, 1930, at a monthly rental of $47.50 per month; that it was stipulated in said lease…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Prince v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Bean v. Aetna Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  4. National Sewing-Mach. Co. v. Willcox & Gibbs Sewing-Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1896
  5. Tennessee v. Bank of CommerceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API