Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 1992No. 89C-20485, 85-5942, 88C-22354, 89C-22016; CA A68720 (Control), A68737, A68738, A68739PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant was tried and convicted in Marion County for conspiracy to commit aggravated murder. ORS 161.450. He argues that venue was proper only in Clackamas County because the evidence showed that he was in Clackamas County when he conspired by telephone with his co-defendant, who was in Marion County. We disagree and affirm.

Venue lies in the county “in which the conduct that constitutes the offense * * * occurred.” ORS 131.305(1). However, venue can exist in more than one county “[i]f conduct constituting elements of an offense * * * occur[s] in two or more counties.” ORS 131.315(1). If the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RoperOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API