Legal Opinion

Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 30, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

2Per curiam

This litigation arises out of a proceeding by Hackensack Water Company (Hackensack) for a revision of rates. The De Forest Lake reservoir was constructed in the State of New York by Spring Valley Water Works and Supply Company (Spring Valley). Spring Valley is a wholly owned subsidiary of Hackensack. Hackensack and Spring Valley entered into a contract for the division of the annual operating costs of the reservoir. By its terms, Hackensack agreed to pay 95% until Spring Valley should draw water from the reservoir whereupon the division of costs would…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rockland County Anti-Reservoir Ass'n v. DuryeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Can Co. v. Director of Div. of Tax.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Hackensack Water Company v. Borough of Old TappanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API