Trexler v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 292, Jan. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Huntingdon County, Dec. T., 1905, No. 172, on verdict for plaintiffs in case of J. F. Trexler and J. L. Trexler v. H. P. Reynolds. Issue framed to determine set-off to claim on judgment bond. Before Woods, P. J. The facts appear in the opinion of the Supreme Court, and in the report of the same case in 43 Pa.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 292, Jan. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Huntingdon County, Dec. T., 1905, No. 172, on verdict for plaintiffs in case of J. F. Trexler and J. L. Trexler v. H. P. Reynolds. Issue framed to determine set-off to claim on judgment bond. Before Woods, P. J. The facts appear in the opinion of the Supreme Court, and in the report of the same case in 43 Pa. Superior Ct. 168. Errors assigned were in certain rulings on evidence, and in directing judgment for plaintiff. cited as to construction of the contract: Graver v. Scott, 80 Pa. 88; Irvin v. Irvin, 142 Pa. 271; Barnhart…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Mestrezat,
J. F. Trexler and J. L. Trexler, the plaintiffs, owned and managed the "Paradise Furnace Farm” in Todd township, Huntingdon county, containing about 4,700 acres of land, and were trading under the firm name of Trexler Brothers and Company. On May 3,1904, H. P. Reynolds, the defendant, became a member of the firm under certain *175terms and conditions set forth in a written article of agreement of that date. The Trexlers owned jointly the one-half, and Reynolds the other half, of all the personal property and real estate. The firm carried on the business of farming…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Trexler v. ReynoldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910