Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bank of Conway v. Stary

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1924Published

1DissentBtruzeel, J.

This case may properly be said to be thoroughly enveloped in a mist of codification. The questions involved would not be at all difficult of solution if the statutory law were all placed to one side. The defendant Stary, having undertaken as maker of the note to pay, and the defendant Sutherland likewise having undertaken as indorser to pay and having broken his promise would, of ■course, be liable without qualification aside from statutes. It would not be a sufficient defense for him to assert that his efforts to persuade the creditor to pursue its remedies against Stary had been unavailing…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Good v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. King v. BaldwinCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1819
  3. Pain v. PackardNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  4. German American State Bank v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Haddock, Blanchard Co. v. . HaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API