Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Rolon

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 14, 2012No. 2009-193-C.APublished

1DissentJustice Flaherty

I respectfully dissent from the holding of the majority in this case. After reviewing the record, the law of this state, and other relevant legal authorities, it is my opinion that the trial justice erred when he denied the defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29 of the Superior Court Rules of Criminal Procedure because the state failed to introduce evidence that the defendant used more force than was necessary to remove the purse from Ms. Joseph. The weight of authority, as well as common sense, leads me to the conclusion that the evidence suggesting that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. In Re DerekSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  3. State v. DomanskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
  4. State v. RodriquezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  5. Waldman v. Shipyard Marina, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API