Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Snapp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 16, 1945No. 14675PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by Mrs. Nora Armstrong, for herself and as next friend for her minor children, and by her children who were not minors. The object of the suit was to recover certain land. The defendants filed what they termed a plea in abatement, but which was in reality a plea in the nature of a special exception, and otherwise answered as will be noted later in this opinion. The trial court, after considering the pleadings, and without hearing any evidence, rendered judgment that plaintiffs take nothing by their suit. We have for consideration therefore only…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. BussTexas Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Austin Neighborhoods Council, Inc. v. Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Bryce v. Corpus Christi Area Convention & Tourist BureauCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Maher v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Chacon v. ANDREWS DISTRIBUTING CO. LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. Anderson v. BundickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API