Legal Opinion

Wolfenden v. . Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 9, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOKE, J., concurring in result; CLARK, C.J., dissenting. The action was determined by his Honor upon the following statement of agreed facts:

1. That prior to 1 June, 1907, the plaintiff was the owner of a certain tract of land lying a Beaufort County, North Carolina, on 11 December, 1906, the said plaintiff sold said tract of land to one N.C. Hughes, Jr., in consideration of the sum of $25,000, and executed a deed to the said Hughes therefore. On 14 December, 1906, the said N.C. Hughes, Jr., executed notes or bonds unto the plaintiff, under seal, aggregating the sum of $25,000, representing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yocum v. First National Bank of BrazilIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wilson v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Auditor General v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. St. Joseph Lead Co. v. SimmsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Sumner & Co. v. County of ColfaxNebraska Supreme Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spiers v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. In re the Appeal of Strong Tire Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API