Legal Opinion

Linthicum v. March

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Rusk. Tried below before the Hon. J. B. Williamson.

1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.

We think there is error in the judgment of the District Court, in this cause, which will require a reversal of the same. Appellees brought this suit against the appellant, in trespass to try title, and the only answer filed by defendant was a general denial, and not guilty. Neither in his pleadings nor evidence, did he claim any title to the land in controversy, excepting by possession; and yet the plaintiffs below were permitted to prove up a claim for title, or rather deeds for title, in the defendant, back to Boss, a common vendor with themselves, so as to save the necessity of proving up…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKey v. WelchTexas Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Keys v. MasonTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Lindley v. MowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Woodward v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Lindley v. MowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API