Sampson v. Sampson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. The ajlegations of the caveat that the applicant was not “mentally or temperamentally able to perform the duties of administratrix . . or to perform the same in fairness to the four heirs at law who are her stepchildren,” were insufficient to show that the applicant was not of sound mind so as to be ineligible to appointment as administratrix. Penal Code (1910), § 33.
2. Upon the death of the husband intestate, his widow, if she is of sound mind and laboring under no disability, is entitled, to the exclusion of all others, to appointment as administratrix of his estate. Civil Code (1910), §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Headman v. RoseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Montgomery v. FoucheSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rivers v. AlsupSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Langford v. SpainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Langford v. SpainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Montgomery v. ParadiseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941