Legal Opinion

Hallmark v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1990No. 05-89-00454-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURNETT, Justice.

Robert Dale Hallmark was convicted of the offense of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, amphetamine. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions, at forty years’ confinement. In three points of error, appellant contends that (1) the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress the evidence of the amphetamine seized from him because the arresting officers did not have probable cause to arrest him for public intoxication; (2) the evidence is insufficient to show an uninterrupted chain of custody of the amphetamine; and (3)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Britton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Balli v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Chudleigh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Petrick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  2. Herman P. Gullatt, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011
  3. Luera, Ralph PenaTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Murrell Ray Bridges v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007
  5. Murrell Ray Bridges v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API