Legal Opinion

Contento v. Alaska State Housing Authority

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1965No. 554PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The superior court entered an order denying petitioner’s motion for summary judgment, after making a determination of facts which were not in dispute and those which were and would have to be tried. A petition for review of such interlocutory order was denied by this court without opinion. Petitioner has requested that we give reasons for denial of the petition, ■

Shortly after the inception of the state court system, we published opinions in two cases where petitions for review of interlocutory orders were denied.1 We did this in order to bring to the attention of the Bar our reasons for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. HillstrandAlaska Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hanby v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lucier v. Steiner Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Orville Wesley Jenkins Layton v. Mary Tabitha O'Dea, f/k/a Mary Tabitha O-Dea-LaytonAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Yako William Collins v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API