Legal Opinion

People v. Hollander

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1961No. Crim. 7589PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

By information defendant was accused in count I of forging and uttering a check for $87.14, and in count II of forging and uttering a check for $78.14. A jury found him guilty as charged. A new trial was denied. Defendant was sentenced to state prison. He appeals from the judgment.

There was evidence on behalf of the prosecution of these facts: Bill Beckwith was the owner of a ranch in Ventura County. Defendant and one Charles Gardner resided on the ranch and were acquaintances. Gardner broke into Beck-with’s residence and stole, among other things, a check protectograph and some…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People v. TubbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Powell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. Chin HaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Tomales Bay Oyster Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. HosnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. RhoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API