Legal Opinion
Margaret S. Wilson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 30, 1991No. 87-2717, 87-2788PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
This case arises from State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s (State Farm) failure to pay benefits to Margaret S. Wilson under the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (CAARA or Act), Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 10-4-701 to -723 (1987 & Supp.1990). State Farm appeals from the jury verdict in favor of Ms. Wilson, alleging numerous errors below. Ms. Wilson cross-appeals the district court’s dismissal of her state law claim of bad faith breach of insurance contract and the court’s grant of a directed verdict for State Farm with respect to her claim for intentional…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Channel v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dale v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Burgess v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Folks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Rexrode v. Allstate Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2007
- Dale v. Guaranty National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.