Bangor Trust Co. v. Christine
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
This is an action on a promissory note for $10,000, payable on demand, made by defendant to the order of plaintiff. Execution and delivery of the note are admitted. The defense is that defendant received no consideration for it. The trial judge submitted this question to the jury, who found in defendant’s favor; from the judgment entered on the verdict plaintiff appeals.
E. P. Buzzard and Floyd M. Hess were respectively president, and secretary and treasurer of plaintiff trust company. At the time of the transaction before us, they were both defaulters to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- State Bank of Moore v. ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- First National Bank v. BaerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lem C. Bryan, Receiver v. Ernest A. Bartlett, Jr., Afton Borum, Hoyt Borum, and E. M. Clem, Lem C. Bryan, Receiver v. Gaylord B. RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Philadelphia v. Rosin's Parking Lots, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Warren National Bank v. JamiesonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Bell, SEC. of Banking v. AubelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- First Nat. Bk., Wmsbg., for Use v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.