Legal Opinion

Matrix Funding Corp. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax Commission

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 3, 1994No. 930355-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

Matrix Funding Corporation (Matrix) appeals an order from the Utah State Tax Commission (Commission) holding that a transaction between Matrix and one of its Utah customers (Customer) requires payment of sales tax. We affirm.

FACTS

Matrix and Customer entered into a Sale and Leaseback Agreement (Sale Agreement), which provided that Matrix would purchase equipment from Customer with title passing to Matrix. Customer then agreed to lease the equipment back for a period of sixty months, giving Customer an option to purchase the equipment at the end of the term, which is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. VigilUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. 49th Street Galleria v. Tax Commission, Auditing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. Board of Equalization v. Utah State Tax Commission Ex Rel. Benchmark, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. US Xpress, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  2. Gardner v. Perry CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  3. Matrix Funding Corp. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mt. Olympus Waters, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  5. Matrix Funding Corp. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API