Legal Opinion

United States v. Patricia Roberts, United States of America v. Alfred L. Hoskins

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 27, 1988No. 87-5162, 87-5163PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TANG, Circuit Judge:

Patricia Roberts and Alfred Hoskins appeal convictions for driving a vehicle with a blood alcohol content above .10 percent, in violation of California law. Hoskins also appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. 1 Each was arrested while driving on the Long Beach Naval Station in Long Beach, California. The prosecutions were under the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 13 (1982). 2

We must decide whether California’s implied consent law provisions, Cal.Veh.Code §§ 23157 (West 1985) and 23157.5 (Supp. 1985), 3 are assimilated pursuant to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence ShimelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Walter T. BestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Christopher D. WilmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Harold W. SainCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Hector Jesus Hernandez, Aka: Mauricio Solis, United States of America v. Jorge Walter CardonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. PondU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. ManningDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1988
  4. United States v. SaulsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  5. United States v. LoveDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API