Legal Opinion

Tevis v. Hammersmith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1903No. 20,121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Clark Circuit Court; J. K. Marsh, Judge. Action by John Tevis against Louis Hammersmith and others. From a judgment for defendants on demurrer to complaint, plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Court, where the judgment was reversed (31 Ind. App. 281). Appealed, to Supreme Court, under clause 3, §1337j Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.

— This is an appeal under clause 3, §10 of the act approved March 12, 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 567, §1337] Burns 1901), from the judgment of the second division of the Appellate Court, reversing the judgment of the Clark Circuit Court, the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and cost, being more than $6,000.

In enacting said third clause of §10, supra, the legislature no doubt had in mind the form of assignment of error required by the decisions of this court in appeals from the general terin of the Marion Superior Court, under §1362 R. S. 1881, Acts 1881, p. 316, §401. The decisions of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beineke v. WurglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Patterson v. Scottish American Mortgage Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Leary v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dotlich v. DotlichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Boland v. EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Scott v. Anderson Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Finley v. ChainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Boland v. EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API