Legal Opinion

Kiesha G.-S. v. Alphonso S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

There is no documentation showing that the incarcerated respondent was served with the summons to appear at this family offense proceeding (see Chase Manhattan Bank v Carlson, 113 AD2d 734, 735 [1985] [“(a)bsent proper service of a summons, a default judgment is a nullity and once it is shown that proper service was not effected the judgment must be unconditionally vacated”]). Although the record does contain a copy of an order to produce, there is no evidence that such order was ever served, or that respondent was made aware that he had to request to be produced (see Matter of Jung [State…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re JungNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Chase Manhattan Bank v. CarlsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. In re Precyse T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Commissioner of Social Services v. Rafael B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 46 Downing Street LLC v. ThompsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API