Legal Opinion
Moody v. Township of Marlboro
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 18, 1995No. Civ. 93-5087(CSF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.
On this motion the court must consider the admissibility of an extrajudicial statement allegedly made to plaintiff by defendant’s attorney during a break in a deposition taken in conjunction with an earlier lawsuit. Plaintiff, Michael Moody, has brought this suit against his employer, the Township of Marlboro, its former mayor, Saul G. Hornik, and its Chief of Police, Joseph Walker. Plaintiff alleges that he was passed over for promotion from patrolman to sergeant in November 1991 in retaliation for, inter alia, his filing of an earlier lawsuit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Hancho C. KimCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- United States v. William Earl BrandonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Ciccarelli v. Gichner Systems Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Jackson v. Schine Lexington CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- Moody v. Township of MarlboroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Brooklyn Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. KosinskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024