Legal Opinion · Concurrence

National Federation of the Blind v. United Airlines Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 19, 2016No. 11-16240Published

1ConcurrenceKleinfeld, Senior Circuit Judge

I join Part II of the majority opinion, and concur in the result.

I do not join in Part I of the opinion, because Part II, addressing implied preemption of the field, entirely controls the outcome of this case. The field is preempted by the forty pages in the Federal Register in which the Department of Transportation has addressed service to disabled passengers.1 Nothing needs to be said about express preemption, so noth*745ing should be said. I cannot think of a good reason for us to speak at considerable length about a subject that does not in the slightest affect the decision of the case before…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Travel All Over the World, Inc., and Ibrahim Y. Elgindy v. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabian AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Rose WILDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Calvin MatchettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API