Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Carter

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 20, 1951No. 10504Published

1DissentPrettyman, Circuit Judge

On the first appeal in this case we held, I thought, that the original grant and the renewals of authority to write bail bonds for pay were functions of the District Court with which this court had no concern; except, of course, in the unlikely event of arbitrary abuse. This court held a due process hearing to be necessary to a mid-term revocation of authority, upon the premise that revocation is wholly different from an original grant or a renewal. And I did not understand that phase of the opinion to be entirely obiter; it was the premise upon which the decision was founded. The premise was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. In Re SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API