In re Rubin & Lipman
District Court, S.D. New York
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings by Rubin & Lipman. Specifications of objection to the bankrupt’s' discharge having been referred to a second special master after the death of a master first appointed, questions were certified to the court before report.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
In September, 1911, specifications of objections to the discharge in bankruptcy of. Rubin & Lipman, individually and as copartners, were referred to Nathaniel S. Prentiss as special master, for examination, testimony, and report. Hearings proceeded before Mr. Prentiss, and, briefs having been submitted, the matter was thereupon closed. Thereafter the papers and exhibits in the case were destroyed by fire; Mr. Prentiss having had his office in the Equitable Life building. Before Mr. Prentiss was able to make his report, he died. Proceedings were thereupon referred to…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. Dental Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- S. Buchsbaum & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946