Legal Opinion

Colter v. Secrest

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1916No. 7409Published

Error from District Court, Wagoner County; R. P. de Graffenried, Judge. Action by Henry Secrest against W. J. Colter and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. On motion for affirmance, and for judgment against sureties on appeal bond.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BURFORD, C.

This cause was submitted on the 19th day of April, 1916. Plaintiffs in error have filed no briefs. Under the well-established rule of this court, the petition in error should be dismissed. Defendant in error has filed his motion for judgment upon the supersedeas bond. It appears that the judgment was recovered against W. J. Colter, George J. Colter, and G. F. O’Neal for the sum of $1,160, with interest thereon at 6 per cent, per annum from December 4, 1014, until paid, and for costs, and that to supersede said judgment the plaintiffs in error furnished a bond, with S. L.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Long v. O. R. Lang & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Starr v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API