Legal Opinion
Centeno v. King
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided November 2, 1977No. Civil No. 158-77PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
This is an action for recovery of salary and expenses allegedly due plaintiff pursuant to a study-leave contract *170which plaintiff claims was wrongfully terminated by defendants.
The narrative following, for the purposes of Rule 52 F.R.C.P., constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Plaintiff Juan Centeno was duly appointed to the position of Director of Administration in the Department of Public Works, St. Croix, V.I., with a pay rate of $16,000.00 per annum, later increased to $19,596.00 per annum. In early November, 1974, Centeno requested…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Illinois State Employees Union, Council 34 v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Vega v. BURGETTSTOWN BOROUGH.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Carolyn Harnett v. George A. UlettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holiday Homes of St. John, Inc. v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Lockhart v. Holiday Homes of St. John, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982