Legal Opinion

State v. Rodarte

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2002No. 01-569PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Appellant Francisco Rodarte (“Rodarte”) was convicted in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, on four counts of Incest, a felony, pursuant to § 45-5-507, MCA. Rodarte appeals his conviction. We affirm the District Court.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 Did the State make an improper closing argument, and if so, should the District Court have granted Rodarte’s motion for mistrial?

¶4 Did the District Court improperly allow evidence which should have been excluded under Rule 404(b), Mont.R.Evid.?

BACKGROUND

¶5 Rodarte and Mona Ekblad, now his ex-wife, are the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. JustMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. GollehonMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re the Marriage of McMahonMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. GladueMontana Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. G. MakarchukMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. OchadleusMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. GulbransonMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. BarkerMontana Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API