Legal Opinion

Castelazo & Associates v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 14, 1965No. 69373; protests 61/16334, etc. (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these protests, consolidated at the trial, consists of marble pieces, imported from Italy and entered at the port of Los Angeles between July 27, 1959, and September 9, 1959, inclusive. They were assessed with duty at 21 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 232(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, as marble, wholly or partly manufactured into articles, not specially provided for. It is claimed that they are entitled to free entry under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gasparri Studios v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Maher v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John Horvath Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Express Forwarding & Storage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API