Legal Opinion · Concurrence

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Montana Power Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1996No. 96-281Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE LEAPHART,

specially concurring.

I concur in the result reached by the Court, however I would reach that result by holding that, under state law, a writ of prohibition does not lie against a private party.

The District Court issued a writ of prohibition preventing the Union and the arbitrator, Mr. Corbett, from proceeding with the arbitration. The writ of prohibition is defined by statute in § 27-27-101, MCA, as follows:

Definition and function of writ of prohibition. The writ of prohibition is the counterpart of the writ of mandate. It arrests the proceedings of any tribunal, corporation,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. International Film Investors v. Arbitration Tribunal of Directors GuildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Kimble Properties, Inc. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API